Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video725 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stephen-Colbert results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 363 hits. Analysis detected 2,630 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,900 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 45% (19,317 of 34,721 keywords). This Stephen-Colbert is better (less manipulative) than 55.60% of the peer group.
Stephen-Colbert
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
45%Stephen-Colbert (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

44% percentile
025507510044.4% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.1%7.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.5%12.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.7%3.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 0.5%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate