Author summary
0% 12 analyzed articles/videos 5,881 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nathan Chizen results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Confirmation Bias , and Anecdotal , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 4,272 hits . Analysis detected 33,307 faulty-reasoning hits from 37,434 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 20% (4,946 of 6,134 authors). This Nathan Chizen is better (less manipulative) than 80.60% of the peer group. Nathan Chizen
Author details
Total words: 37,434
Article count: 12
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.4% percentile 1.7% BS Score12 analyzed articles37.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 4.2% 4.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 11.4% 11.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.4% 4.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.4%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.2%, sitewide 0.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst