Author summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,227 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eboni Boykin-Patterson results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Self-Serving Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 390 hits. Analysis detected 4,176 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,908 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 39% (3,818 of 6,229 authors). This Eboni Boykin-Patterson is better (less manipulative) than 61.30% of the peer group.
Eboni Boykin-Patterson
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
39%Eboni Boykin-Patterson (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,908
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

39% percentile
025507510038.7% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.0%8.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.7%4.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.2%4.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.4%3.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.6%2.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 4.6%4.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 5.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.6%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.2%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Actor-Observer Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.6%Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos