Vince Vaughn rips late night hosts Colbert and Kimmel for preaching politics: 'It stopped being funny' 0%

By Stephen M. Lepore0%

3/25/2026, 2:21:56 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Red Herring as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 137 hits. Analysis detected 852 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,003 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the article peer group.

Vince Vaughn said late night comics have become unfunny and inauthentic for constantly preaching politics. 
The Wedding Crashers star appeared on Theo Von's podcast where he appeared to take a shot at Jimmy Kimmel and Stephen Colbert - though neither were named. 
'People want authenticity, and I think that the talk shows to a large part became agenda-based and they all became so about their politics and who's good and who's bad,' Vaughn said. 
'They were gonna evangelize people to what they thought.' 
The actor said the political subject matter has contributed to the downfall in ratings, as viewers move toward other platforms. 
'So people just rejected it, because it didn't feel authentic. 
It felt like they had an agenda,' he said. 
Von and Vaughn agreed that late night hosts seem to always make fun of 'white rednecks.' 
'It's not being funny and it started feeling like I was in f***in' a class I didn't want to take, do you know what I mean? 
I'm getting scolded!' 
He also dismissed the notion that the shows are less successful because of streaming providing more options. 
'The phenomenon isn't what they say. 
They always blame technology, but the reality is it's the approach.' 
Vince Vaughn criticized late night TV talk shows for valuing politics over comedy in an appearance on Theo Von's podcast 
The Wedding Crashers star, who has long identified as a libertarian , shook his head when the host said that the likes of Jimmy Kimmel and Stephen Colbert were failing. 
Pictured: Vaughn on Jimmy Fallon's show last April 
He added that he understood that hosts like Colbert - whose show will be leaving the airwaves in May - had to discuss the news but they prioritized their views over jokes. 
'It's part of the job because you've got to talk about current events, but you don't want to become part of a group and feel like you're a champion for one ideology. 
You want to make fun of everybody.' 
Vaughn praised podcasters like Von for filling the void the late night shows used to own by catering to broad audiences. 
'The podcasts have gotten so much more popular with less production, less writers, less staff. 
And the reason is  people want authenticity.' 
At the same time, Vaughn did not suggest he had lost friends or jobs because of his politics, which he said include 'opinions on both sides.' 
'I always got along with people  and try to be honest about who I am. 
If you're constantly worried what someone else thinks of you and you're only around them a couple hours a day, you're miserable most of the time. 
You've got to find the way to be yourself, but be respectful.' 
Vaughn surprised many with a visit to the Oval Office last April as the White House shared a smiling picture of him with President Trump. 
Although Vaughn has not publicly said he supports Trump, the image divided fans as some said they were disappointed to see him with the Republican, despite the actor previously showing support at one of Trump's celebratory inauguration balls in January. 
He added that he understood the likes of Kimmel and Colbert - whose show will be leaving the airwaves in May - had to discuss the news but they prioritized their views over jokes. 
Pictured: Vaughn on Jay Leno in 1998 
Vaughn praised podcasters like Von for filling the void the late night shows used to own by catering to broad audiences 
Vaughn also hobnobbed with Trump at the College Football Playoff National Championship in New Orleans in 2020, where the actor was seen sitting next to Trump and First Lady Melania. 
After some criticized Vaughn for his interaction with Trump at the game, he defended the move and said it did not imply an endorsement of Trump or his policies. 
'In my career I've met a lot of politicians who I've always been cordial to; I've met Nancy Pelosi and was cordial to her as well,' he said of the Democratic Speaker of the House, to the LA Times. 
As evidence, Vaughn added that he greeted the Democratic strategist James Carville, who had a cameo in Wedding Crashers, at the same game. 
'It was the only time I've ever met him. 
We said hello. 
He was very personable,' he said, adding with a laugh, 'I didn't get into policies.' 
The True Detective star continued, ascribing much of the outrage to a minority of people online. 
The three appeared deep in conversation at the time, and their exchange ended with Vaughn and Trump warmly shaking hands. 
'I think people are more charged than ever about these things,' he continued. 
'But I don't think most people take that stuff as seriously as the small percentage that's making noise about it. 
Vaughn surprised fans with a visit to the Oval Office last April as the White House shared a smiling picture of him with President Trump 
Vaughn was sharply criticized in 2020 when he was seen shaking Trump's hand at a football game 
Vince Vaughn seen chatting with Donald Trump at a college football game. 
Vince shakes Trump's hand before saying goodbye to him and his wife Melania. 
'I was raised with the idea that you could have different likes and beliefs and you should respect and defend that in other people, not shout it down. 
'The people you disagree with the most, you should stand up for their right to do that.' 
In remarks to the New York Times in 2023, Vaughn explained that his views veer toward libertarianism. 
'I definitely am a believer more in allowing individuals to make choices. 
So I think that drugs should be legal and people should have guns. 
But I realized that you have different cultures that would feel strongly,' he said. 
'I’d rather say let people make their choices, and they can make different choices and have the consequences of their choices.' 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 7.3%Stephen M. Lepore: 3.6%Daily Mail: 3.7%Confirmation Bias7.3%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.4%Daily Mail: 1.0%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 2.8%Daily Mail: 3.5%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.7%Daily Mail: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 1.4%Daily Mail: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 2.0%Daily Mail: 1.8%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 7.5%Stephen M. Lepore: 9.4%Daily Mail: 9.1%Framing Effect7.5%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.2%Daily Mail: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 2.1%Daily Mail: 2.3%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 1.0%Daily Mail: 1.2%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 13.2%Daily Mail: 12.8%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 4.4%Stephen M. Lepore: 2.5%Daily Mail: 2.0%Self-Serving Bias4.4%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 1.2%Daily Mail: 1.2%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 4.2%Stephen M. Lepore: 2.4%Daily Mail: 1.2%In-Group Bias4.2%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 1.7%Daily Mail: 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 1.4%Daily Mail: 4.6%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.5%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 1.3%Daily Mail: 1.6%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.2%Daily Mail: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 3.2%Daily Mail: 1.7%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 1.1%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.7%Daily Mail: 0.2%Straw Man1.1%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 3.2%Daily Mail: 4.0%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 1.1%Stephen M. Lepore: 1.9%Daily Mail: 1.1%False Dilemma1.1%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.8%Daily Mail: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 7.9%Stephen M. Lepore: 4.4%Daily Mail: 4.3%Hasty Generalization7.9%This article: 13.7%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.6%Daily Mail: 0.6%Red Herring13.7%This article: 5.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.8%Bandwagon5.0%This article: 2.9%Stephen M. Lepore: 7.1%Daily Mail: 7.6%Appeal to Emotion2.9%This article: 1.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 1.1%Daily Mail: 0.6%Begging the Question1.0%This article: 2.8%Stephen M. Lepore: 3.8%Daily Mail: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)2.8%This article: 3.9%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.2%Tu Quoque3.9%This article: 2.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.5%Daily Mail: 0.6%Burden of Proof2.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 3.9%Stephen M. Lepore: 1.5%Daily Mail: 3.1%Anecdotal3.9%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 1.1%Daily Mail: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.6%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Middle Ground2.6%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.2%Daily Mail: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 1.8%Daily Mail: 3.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 1.9%Daily Mail: 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 7.3%Stephen M. Lepore: 6.0%Daily Mail: 9.2%Biased Writer Voice7.3%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 1.2%Daily Mail: 0.8%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.7%Daily Mail: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 6.6%Stephen M. Lepore: 2.6%Daily Mail: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias6.6%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.4%Daily Mail: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

1003 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker56%attributed speech444writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageVince Vaughn • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageVince Vaughn • 32 words • 0.0% coverageVince Vaughn • 9 words • 0.0% coverageVince Vaughn • 20 words • 0.0% coverageVince Vaughn • 10 words • 0.0% coverageVince Vaughn • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageVince Vaughn • 26 words • 0.0% coverageVince Vaughn • 3 words • 0.0% coverageVince Vaughn • 17 words • 0.0% coverageVince Vaughn • 6 words • 0.0% coverageVince Vaughn • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageVince Vaughn • 32 words • 0.0% coverageVince Vaughn • 7 words • 0.0% coverageVince Vaughn • 21 words • 0.0% coverageVince Vaughn • 15 words • 0.0% coverageVince Vaughn • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageVince Vaughn • 16 words • 0.0% coverageVince Vaughn • 26 words • 0.0% coverageVince Vaughn • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageVince Vaughn • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageVince Vaughn • 39 words • 0.0% coverageVince Vaughn • 23 words • 0.0% coverageVince Vaughn • 9 words • 0.0% coverageVince Vaughn • 3 words • 0.0% coverageVince Vaughn • 15 words • 0.0% coverageVince Vaughn • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageVince Vaughn • 13 words • 0.0% coverageVince Vaughn • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageVince Vaughn • 28 words • 0.0% coverageVince Vaughn • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageVince Vaughn • 12 words • 0.0% coverageVince Vaughn • 13 words • 0.0% coverageVince Vaughn • 14 words • 0.0% coverageVince Vaughn • 21 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Vince Vaughn

57%flagged-word coverage
559 attributed words100% of attributed speech61% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Biased Writer Voice-16.4 ptsWriter: 16.4%Vince Vaughn: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -14.9 ptsWriter: 14.9%Vince Vaughn: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.