Topic summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos2,074 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stephen Colbert results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 933 hits. Analysis detected 6,342 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,947 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (11,792 of 15,447 topics). This Stephen Colbert is better (less manipulative) than 76.30% of the peer group.
Stephen Colbert
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,947
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

24% percentile
025507510023.7% percentile
2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.4%13.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.0%3.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.4%2.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate