Trump dances on Colbert’s Late Show grave with AI dumpster video 13%

By Jasmine Fernández0%

5/23/2026, 12:27:23 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 13 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Halo Effect, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 37.6% saturation with 130 hits. Analysis detected 517 faulty-reasoning hits from 346 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 29.9% and a BS Rank of 13% (17,977 of 20,557 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 87.40% of the article peer group.

President Donald Trump has shared a heavily edited, AI-generated video on Truth Social Friday evening, targeting Stephen Colbert following the final broadcast of The Late Show the night before. 
The doctored clip depicts the president walking up behind the late-night host, physically lifting him and depositing him into a dumpster. 
The video then cuts to Trump dancing to the song “YMCA” by the Village People before a cheering crowd. 
The post marks the latest escalation in a long-standing dispute between Trump and the former television host. 
Following the show’s final broadcast Thursday, Trump praised the conclusion of the program on social media, writing that Colbert was a “total jerk” with “no talent, no ratings, no life.” 
“Thank goodness he’s finally gone!” 
Trump wrote on Truth Social. 
CBS announced the cancellation of the 33-year late-night franchise last July. 
At the time, the network described the move as “purely a financial decision against a challenging backdrop in late night,” rather than a reflection of the program’s content or performance. 
But the cancellation occurred just days after Colbert publicly criticized CBS’s parent company, Paramount, for agreeing to a $16 million settlement with Trump. 
The legal dispute involved allegations that 60 Minutes had deceptively edited a 2024 interview with then-Vice President Kamala Harris during the presidential campaign. 
Colbert had joked about the payment on air, referring to it as a “big fat bribe.” 
Despite the controversy, Colbert’s final episode drew 6.74 million viewers, making it the most-watched weeknight episode of his 11-year tenure as host. 
Throughout its final season, the series maintained an average audience of 2.7 million viewers. 
The final broadcast featured appearances by several prominent figures, including a joint segment with rival late-night hosts Jimmy Kimmel, Jimmy Fallon, Seth Meyers and John Oliver. 
Paul McCartney served as the final guest, performing The Beatles’ song “Hello, Goodbye” alongside Colbert, his family and production staff. 
The program concluded with McCartney and Colbert symbolically pulling a power lever backstage at the historic Ed Sullivan Theater, turning out the building’s lights. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.9%Jasmine Fernández: 1.5%The Independent: 2.9%Confirmation Bias4.9%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.5%The Independent: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 8.4%Jasmine Fernández: 3.3%The Independent: 3.2%Availability Heuristic8.4%This article: 4.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.5%The Independent: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic4.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.2%The Independent: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 1.1%The Independent: 2.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 37.6%Jasmine Fernández: 6.4%The Independent: 8.2%Framing Effect37.6%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.9%The Independent: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.2%Jasmine Fernández: 0.6%The Independent: 0.6%Status Quo Bias3.2%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.2%The Independent: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 6.4%Jasmine Fernández: 1.8%The Independent: 2.4%Optimism Bias6.4%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 1.8%The Independent: 1.6%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 37.0%Jasmine Fernández: 9.2%The Independent: 12.1%Negativity Bias37.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 1.0%The Independent: 2.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.3%The Independent: 1.2%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.3%The Independent: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 1.1%The Independent: 1.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.3%The Independent: 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 13.3%Jasmine Fernández: 3.4%The Independent: 2.2%Halo Effect13.3%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.0%The Independent: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 1.3%The Independent: 1.5%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.5%The Independent: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.5%The Independent: 2.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.0%The Independent: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 4.7%The Independent: 3.8%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.4%The Independent: 1.5%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.1%The Independent: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.1%The Independent: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 1.3%The Independent: 4.2%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.3%The Independent: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.4%The Independent: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 3.2%Jasmine Fernández: 4.3%The Independent: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion3.2%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.5%The Independent: 0.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 6.6%Jasmine Fernández: 1.9%The Independent: 2.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)6.6%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.3%The Independent: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.3%The Independent: 0.7%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.2%The Independent: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.1%The Independent: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 6.1%Jasmine Fernández: 1.6%The Independent: 2.2%Anecdotal6.1%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 1.7%The Independent: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.1%The Independent: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.0%The Independent: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 8.7%Jasmine Fernández: 1.7%The Independent: 2.6%Unattributed Quote8.7%This article: 10.1%Jasmine Fernández: 2.2%The Independent: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection10.1%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 2.7%The Independent: 7.9%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 2.3%The Independent: 1.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.9%The Independent: 2.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.3%The Independent: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.0%The Independent: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

346 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers28%attributed speech249writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 30 words • 100.0% coverageTrump • 5 words • 100.0% coverageTrump • 5 words • 0.0% coverageCBS • 11 words • 0.0% coverageCBS • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageStephen Colbert • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Trump

88%flagged-word coverage
40 attributed words41% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%45.0%90.0%Quote-first Misdirection+87.5 ptsWriter: 0.0%Trump: 87.5%87.5%Unattributed Quote+75.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Trump: 75.0%75.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.