Topic summary
0% 7 analyzed articles/videos 4,948 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jimmy Kimmel results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 3,298 hits . Analysis detected 26,776 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,359 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 41% (9,130 of 15,330 topics). This Jimmy Kimmel is better (less manipulative) than 59.60% of the peer group. Jimmy Kimmel
Topic details
Total words: 20,359
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.4% percentile 2.6% BS Score7 analyzed articles20.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 11.9% 11.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 9.7% 9.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 4.3% 4.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 16.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.1%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst