Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,003 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vince Vaughn results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 391 hits. Analysis detected 2,871 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,009 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (7,228 of 16,562 topics). This Vince Vaughn is worse (more manipulative) than 56.40% of the peer group.
Vince Vaughn
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,009
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

56% percentile
025507510056.4% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.0%13.0%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 4.5%4.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.8%3.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 8.8%8.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.6%2.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.7%1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 6.4%6.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Red Herring: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Tu Quoque: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.2%Bandwagon: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos