Keyword summary
72% 26 analyzed articles/videos 16,825 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Silicon Valley results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 12,307 hits . Analysis detected 134,655 faulty-reasoning hits from 132,347 analyzed words across 26 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (28,102 of 35,184 keywords). This Silicon Valley is better (less manipulative) than 79.90% of the peer group. Silicon Valley
Keyword details
Total words: 132,347
Article count: 26
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.1% percentile 1.9% BS Score26 analyzed articles132.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.3% 9.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 8.5% 8.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst