Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Samanth Subramanian results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.9% saturation with 2,264 hits . Analysis detected 11,649 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,616 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Samanth Subramanian is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Samanth Subramanian
Author details
Total words: 12,616
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles12.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 17.9% 17.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 17.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Author 4.6%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Straw Man: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst