Keyword summary
88% 8 analyzed articles/videos 4,255 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Senate Hearing results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.2% saturation with 7,104 hits . Analysis detected 32,431 faulty-reasoning hits from 31,957 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 29% (26,873 of 37,536 keywords). This Senate Hearing is better (less manipulative) than 71.60% of the peer group. Senate Hearing
Keyword details
Total words: 31,957
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.4% percentile 2.1% BS Score8 analyzed articles32K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 22.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst