Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,267 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jennifer Griffin results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , In-Group Bias , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.9% saturation with 1,059 hits . Analysis detected 4,118 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,068 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 49% (3,416 of 6,628 authors). This Jennifer Griffin is better (less manipulative) than 51.50% of the peer group. Jennifer Griffin
Author details
Total words: 5,068
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 48.5% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.6% 8.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.9% 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 20.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst