Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,594 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Samuel-Alito results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 39.6% saturation with 4,879 hits . Analysis detected 16,943 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,316 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 67% (12,543 of 37,536 keywords). This Samuel-Alito is worse (more manipulative) than 66.60% of the peer group. Samuel-Alito
Keyword details
Total words: 12,316
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.6% percentile 3.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles12.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 39.6% 39.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 12.2% 12.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.3% 9.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.3% 14.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 39.6%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 2.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Straw Man: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst