Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,184 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jay Caruso results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Ad Hominem , and Politically Right Leaning Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 26.1% saturation with 1,236 hits . Analysis detected 4,990 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,736 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 58% (2,728 of 6,499 authors). This Jay Caruso is worse (more manipulative) than 58.00% of the peer group. Jay Caruso
Author details
Total words: 4,736
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
58% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 58.0% percentile 2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 26.1% 26.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.6% 10.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 8.4% 8.4% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 6.8% 6.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 26.1%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 10.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Ad Hominem: Author 8.4%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 1.4% Straw Man: Author 5.6%, sitewide 0.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.2%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Genetic Fallacy: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst