Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,257 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dahlia Lithwick results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 37.4% saturation with 3,065 hits . Analysis detected 11,133 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,205 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 72% (1,808 of 6,463 authors). This Dahlia Lithwick is worse (more manipulative) than 72.00% of the peer group. Dahlia Lithwick
Author details
Total words: 8,205
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
72% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 72.0% percentile 3.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 37.4% 37.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.5% 11.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.0% 7.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 15.3% 15.3% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 6.0% 6.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 37.4%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 11.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 15.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.0%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.1%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Author 6.0%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 2.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Straw Man: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.9% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst