Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 893 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Joseph Stern results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias , Slippery Slope , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 24.2% saturation with 1,636 hits . Analysis detected 9,730 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,749 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 75% (1,629 of 6,498 authors). This Mark Joseph Stern is worse (more manipulative) than 74.90% of the peer group. Mark Joseph Stern
Author details
Total words: 6,749
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
75% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 74.9% percentile 4.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 24.2% 24.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.3% 8.3% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 13.7% 13.7% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 12.4% 12.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.2% 9.2% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 11.9% 11.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.3%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 24.2%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.4%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 13.7%, sitewide 2.0% Slippery Slope: Author 12.4%, sitewide 1.7% Ad Hominem: Author 11.9%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 4.6% Straw Man: Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst