Keyword summary
81% 6 analyzed articles/videos 3,754 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rescues results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and In-Group Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 2,355 hits . Analysis detected 14,365 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,536 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 36% (24,365 of 37,536 keywords). This Rescues is better (less manipulative) than 64.90% of the peer group. Rescues
Keyword details
Total words: 15,536
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.1% percentile 2.3% BS Score6 analyzed articles15.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.5% 10.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 15.2% 15.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst