Stuck in one of Colorado’s abandoned missile silos? This fire department will now charge $5,000 to rescue you. 76%

By Katie Langford12%

7/17/2026, 10:00:22 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 37.9% saturation with 204 hits. Analysis detected 1,287 faulty-reasoning hits from 538 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 67.5% and a BS Rank of 76% (5,363 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 75.50% of the article peer group.

People who break into abandoned missile silos near metro Denver will now face a new consequence on top of potentially fatal injuries  a $5,000 fee from the rescue teams that must go in after them. 
The Sable Altura Fire Department plans to start charging people who trespass and get trapped in the deserted nuclear complexes after an “unprecedented” rise in break-ins and rescues, Arapahoe County officials announced Thursday. 
Crews with the Deer Trail and Sable Altura fire departments have rescued five people who broke into the sites and became trapped in the last two years, agency leaders said at a news conference. 
Two of those rescues happened within a week of each other earlier this month and sent an 18-year-old woman to the hospital for carbon dioxide exposure after she was trapped in a silo for at least four hours. 
Before that first rescue in Deer Trail two years ago, Sable Altura Chief Rich Solomon said he doesn’t remember another person getting trapped in the silos in his 25-year tenure with the department. 
One factor law enforcement officials said may be contributing to the increase in trespassing is the rising popularity of urban exploration, or urbex  when people break into abandoned or derelict man-made structures. 
“There are a lot of urban explorers that are on social media and the more that they publicize going through these abandoned buildings or missile silos, the more these kids want to do it,” Arapahoe County Sheriff’s Office spokesperson Ginger Delgado said. 
“So our message is: Please don’t do it.” 
Colorado is home to 11 abandoned Titan and Atlas missile silo complexes, none of which are open to the public, and several of which are known to have toxic levels of carbon monoxide, contaminated water and soil, according to the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment. 
The complexes are not only potentially deadly for the people who break in, but also for the crews who must go in after them, Sable Altura Division Chief Tara Monks said. 
“When rescuers go down, we try to be as safe as possible, but they’re also going into the unknown,” she said. 
“By 50 to 60 feet down, communication is limited, radios don’t work, we’re going into places where we can’t talk to each other… We don’t know what we’re going into, and we always take a risk when we send somebody over the edge.” 
The 18-year-old woman and two juveniles who were with her are facing trespassing charges for the July 8 break-in, according to the Arapahoe County Sheriff’s Office. 
A 28-year-old woman who was rescued from an underground shaft on July 14 and her 19-year-old companion are also facing trespassing charges. 
The property owners have done everything possible to secure the sites, Solomon said, including installing fences and locks. 
“I imagine that we all lock our doors at night and we trust that that’s safe,” he said. 
“But then if we woke up and found somebody crawling around in our basement in the name of urban exploration, we would probably feel violated and we would probably want that person charged. 
That’s what this is.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 9.5%Katie Langford: 1.1%Baltimore Sun: 1.9%Confirmation Bias9.5%This article: 1.9%Katie Langford: 0.8%Baltimore Sun: 1.1%Anchoring Bias1.9%This article: 14.1%Katie Langford: 3.8%Baltimore Sun: 2.5%Availability Heuristic14.1%This article: 3.3%Katie Langford: 0.2%Baltimore Sun: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic3.3%This article: 0.0%Katie Langford: 0.4%Baltimore Sun: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Langford: 1.1%Baltimore Sun: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 27.0%Katie Langford: 4.6%Baltimore Sun: 4.3%Framing Effect27.0%This article: 12.8%Katie Langford: 0.9%Baltimore Sun: 0.6%Loss Aversion12.8%This article: 0.0%Katie Langford: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Langford: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Langford: 2.0%Baltimore Sun: 2.3%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 11.9%Katie Langford: 0.9%Baltimore Sun: 1.2%Pessimism Bias11.9%This article: 37.9%Katie Langford: 7.0%Baltimore Sun: 7.6%Negativity Bias37.9%This article: 3.3%Katie Langford: 0.8%Baltimore Sun: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias3.3%This article: 0.0%Katie Langford: 0.2%Baltimore Sun: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Langford: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 3.3%Katie Langford: 0.2%Baltimore Sun: 0.6%In-Group Bias3.3%This article: 0.0%Katie Langford: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Langford: 0.7%Baltimore Sun: 1.7%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Langford: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Langford: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 13.2%Katie Langford: 2.2%Baltimore Sun: 1.5%Recency Bias13.2%This article: 6.1%Katie Langford: 0.4%Baltimore Sun: 0.2%Primacy Effect6.1%This article: 0.0%Katie Langford: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Langford: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Langford: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 14.5%Katie Langford: 9.0%Baltimore Sun: 2.5%Appeal to Authority14.5%This article: 0.0%Katie Langford: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Langford: 0.4%Baltimore Sun: 0.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Langford: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 13.2%Katie Langford: 2.1%Baltimore Sun: 3.4%Hasty Generalization13.2%This article: 0.0%Katie Langford: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Langford: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 14.7%Katie Langford: 3.6%Baltimore Sun: 3.7%Appeal to Emotion14.7%This article: 0.0%Katie Langford: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 13.9%Katie Langford: 2.1%Baltimore Sun: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)13.9%This article: 0.0%Katie Langford: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 6.1%Katie Langford: 0.4%Baltimore Sun: 0.3%Burden of Proof6.1%This article: 0.0%Katie Langford: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Langford: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 19.5%Katie Langford: 1.9%Baltimore Sun: 1.3%Anecdotal19.5%This article: 0.0%Katie Langford: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 6.1%Katie Langford: 1.3%Baltimore Sun: 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)6.1%This article: 0.0%Katie Langford: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Langford: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Langford: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 3.3%Katie Langford: 0.2%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Special Pleading3.3%This article: 0.0%Katie Langford: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Langford: 0.4%Baltimore Sun: 1.5%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 1.9%Katie Langford: 0.2%Baltimore Sun: 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection1.9%This article: 0.0%Katie Langford: 1.4%Baltimore Sun: 3.3%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 1.5%Katie Langford: 0.2%Baltimore Sun: 2.1%Indoctrination1.5%This article: 0.0%Katie Langford: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Langford: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Langford: 1.2%Baltimore Sun: 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

538 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers60%attributed speech214writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageRich Solomon • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageGinger Delgado • 42 words • 0.0% coverageGinger Delgado • 8 words • 100.0% coverageColorado Department of Public Health and Environment • 47 words • 0.0% coverageTara Monks • 31 words • 0.0% coverageTara Monks • 21 words • 0.0% coverageTara Monks • 43 words • 0.0% coverageArapahoe County Sheriff’s Office • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageRich Solomon • 18 words • 0.0% coverageRich Solomon • 18 words • 0.0% coverageRich Solomon • 33 words • 0.0% coverageRich Solomon • 4 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Rich Solomon

100%flagged-word coverage
106 attributed words33% of attributed speech90% writer coverage
0%2.5%5.0%Quote-first Misdirection-4.7 ptsWriter: 4.7%Rich Solomon: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.