Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Carbon Monoxide results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 282 hits. Analysis detected 2,118 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,614 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Carbon Monoxide is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Carbon Monoxide
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Carbon Monoxide (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,614
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 17.2%17.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 13.4%13.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.9%6.9%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 6.7%6.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 8.6%8.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 17.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 13.4%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Loss Aversion: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.5%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.4%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Special Pleading: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.3%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos