Author summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos6,732 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Helene Cooper results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.1% saturation with 1,648 hits. Analysis detected 15,955 faulty-reasoning hits from 26,928 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠15% (5,413 of 6,316 authors). This Helene Cooper is better (less manipulative) than 85.70% of the peer group.
Helene Cooper
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠15%Helene Cooper (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 26,928
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

14% percentile
025507510014.3% percentile
1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles26.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.9%4.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.1%6.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.5%5.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 6.0%6.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos