Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 6,413 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nicholas Kulish results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Self-Serving Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 1,730 hits . Analysis detected 15,434 faulty-reasoning hits from 25,652 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 10% (5,723 of 6,359 authors). This Nicholas Kulish is better (less manipulative) than 90.00% of the peer group. Nicholas Kulish
Author details
Total words: 25,652
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.0% percentile 1.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles25.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.6% 4.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.7% 6.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst