Keyword summary
0%8 analyzed articles/videos4,100 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julia Letlow results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 2,005 hits. Analysis detected 16,432 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,728 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (29,723 of 37,326 keywords). This Julia Letlow is better (less manipulative) than 79.60% of the peer group.
Julia Letlow
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
21%Julia Letlow (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

20% percentile
025507510020.4% percentile
1.9% BS Score8 analyzed articles17.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 11.3%11.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.5%10.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 10.4%10.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.4%2.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate