MS NOW95%

“Clobbered”: Trump vows Cassidy will lose Senate GOP primary in Louisiana 76%

By Adam Hudacek60%

5/16/2026, 9:42:03 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 38% saturation with 296 hits. Analysis detected 1,864 faulty-reasoning hits from 778 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 67.5% and a BS Rank of 76% (5,378 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 75.40% of the article peer group.

“Bill Cassidy is a sleazebag, a terrible guy, who is BAD FOR LOUISIANA.” 
And so began President Donald Trump’s social media rant on Saturday, fresh off his trip to China, back in Washington and waging his revenge tour in full force on a day when fealty to the president is on the ballot in the Bayou State. 
“Now he’s going to get CLOBBERED, hopefully, in today’s BIG election, by two great people!!!” 
the president continued in his Truth Social post, asking GOP voters in Louisiana to cast their ballots for Rep. 
Julia Letlow, R-La., the candidate Trump is backing to win the high-profile Senate GOP primary contest in a key test of his strength within the Republican Party as he seeks to punish Cassidy for his betrayal. 
In his first Truth Social post aimed at Cassidy since returning to U.S. soil, Trump pointed to the two-term senator’s biggest sin: His 2021 vote to convict Trump on impeachment charges related to the Jan. 
6 Capitol riots. 
“Senator Bill Cassidy of Louisiana is a disloyal disaster. 
His entire past campaign for the Senate was about ‘TRUMP,’ how he’s with me all the way, and then, after winning, he turned around and voted to IMPEACH me for something that has now proven to be total ‘bullshit!’” 
Trump wrote. 
A third candidate, Louisiana state treasurer John Fleming is also seeking the GOP Senate nomination, and recent polling from Emerson College shows both challengers ahead of Cassidy. 
Still, Cassidy has continued to reach out to MAGA voters, saying Friday that the race “is not me versus Donald Trump.” 
“If somebody wants someone who can work with President Trump for the good of our country and the good of our state, I'm your candidate,” Cassidy told MS NOW. 
He did not comment on whether the Republican party has room for those that cross Trump. 
When asked for comment on the president’s criticism posted Saturday, Cassidy’s campaign responded with a video of Letlow referring to herself as a “progressive leader.” 
Cassidy’s battle for political survival illustrates the stark divide within the Republican Party between the establishment and true believers in the MAGA movement. 
Richard Logis, a former MAGA activist who defected from Trump’s movement, said Saturday that he believes the MAGA wing of the GOP, which prides itself on being a big-tent party, will continue to splinter as the president’s popularity sinks. 
“I do believe that the cracks are there right now,” Logis said on MS NOW’s “The Weekend,” adding, “I think the schisms and the chasms are widening.” 
Logis and members of his organization, called Leaving MAGA, are part of a small but vocal community of Republicans mounting an effort to redirect the future of the GOP away from the MAGA movement that Trump created, but their mission faces long odds. 
According to polling by YouGov, 63% of Republicans today identify as MAGA, up from 53% in 2025 and 38% back in 2023, a year after Logis left the movement. 
However, MAGA identification among registered independent voters remains low in the latest polling data  just 12%  and overall, only one in four voters in the U.S. identifies as MAGA. 
Trump has spent much of his second term punishing those within his party who broke with his agenda, including a handful of state senators in Indiana who rejected his push to redraw the state’s congressional map. 
Of the seven state senators who were challenged by Trump-backed candidates, five lost their reelection bids. 
The ideological battle within the GOP came into focus early in Trump’s second term. 
Multiple Republican lawmakers, including onetime MAGA firebrand former Rep. 
Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., and Sen. 
Thom Tillis, R-N.C., either resigned or announced their retirement after breaking with the president. 
Greene, who publicly fell out with the president over his ties to Jeffrey Epstein, said in January that “MAGA purity tests and loyalty demands are going to cost the Republican Party votes.” 
She left Congress after Trump labeled her a “traitor” for criticizing his administration’s handling of the Epstein files and backed a GOP primary challenger in her district. 
The president’s pattern of political retribution began in force following his departure from the White House in 2021, when he used his influence to oust prominent GOP incumbents who voted for his impeachment or conviction, including former Rep. 
Liz Cheney of Wyoming. 
On Saturday night in Louisiana after the polls have closed and the counting is done, Cassidy, one of three Republican senators remaining who voted to convict Trump, may find out whether he’s joining Cheney in early retirement. 
Mychael Schnell and Syedah Asghar contributed to this report. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 9.6%Adam Hudacek: 4.6%MS NOW: 7.5%Confirmation Bias9.6%This article: 3.7%Adam Hudacek: 0.2%MS NOW: 1.2%Anchoring Bias3.7%This article: 3.7%Adam Hudacek: 7.3%MS NOW: 3.7%Availability Heuristic3.7%This article: 6.0%Adam Hudacek: 0.5%MS NOW: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic6.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Hudacek: 1.5%MS NOW: 1.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Hudacek: 1.4%MS NOW: 2.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 5.9%Adam Hudacek: 14.5%MS NOW: 15.4%Framing Effect5.9%This article: 0.0%Adam Hudacek: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.7%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Hudacek: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Hudacek: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 3.7%Adam Hudacek: 0.2%MS NOW: 2.4%Optimism Bias3.7%This article: 13.4%Adam Hudacek: 1.7%MS NOW: 3.2%Pessimism Bias13.4%This article: 31.5%Adam Hudacek: 16.9%MS NOW: 19.2%Negativity Bias31.5%This article: 4.6%Adam Hudacek: 5.9%MS NOW: 2.4%Self-Serving Bias4.6%This article: 21.6%Adam Hudacek: 2.1%MS NOW: 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error21.6%This article: 0.0%Adam Hudacek: 1.2%MS NOW: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 3.0%Adam Hudacek: 2.2%MS NOW: 3.5%In-Group Bias3.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Hudacek: 0.0%MS NOW: 2.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Hudacek: 0.3%MS NOW: 2.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Hudacek: 0.2%MS NOW: 1.8%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Hudacek: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.3%Adam Hudacek: 0.9%MS NOW: 1.8%Recency Bias5.3%This article: 0.0%Adam Hudacek: 0.3%MS NOW: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Hudacek: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.2%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 7.8%Adam Hudacek: 2.0%MS NOW: 4.7%Ad Hominem7.8%This article: 0.0%Adam Hudacek: 1.0%MS NOW: 1.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 3.7%Adam Hudacek: 2.7%MS NOW: 5.4%Appeal to Authority3.7%This article: 7.6%Adam Hudacek: 0.6%MS NOW: 2.2%False Dilemma7.6%This article: 4.8%Adam Hudacek: 0.5%MS NOW: 2.2%Slippery Slope4.8%This article: 0.0%Adam Hudacek: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 14.7%Adam Hudacek: 4.2%MS NOW: 8.1%Hasty Generalization14.7%This article: 0.0%Adam Hudacek: 1.0%MS NOW: 0.7%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Hudacek: 0.6%MS NOW: 0.9%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 6.4%Adam Hudacek: 2.5%MS NOW: 9.8%Appeal to Emotion6.4%This article: 0.0%Adam Hudacek: 0.4%MS NOW: 2.4%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 29.2%Adam Hudacek: 4.0%MS NOW: 3.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)29.2%This article: 0.0%Adam Hudacek: 0.8%MS NOW: 0.6%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 4.1%Adam Hudacek: 0.6%MS NOW: 0.9%Burden of Proof4.1%This article: 0.0%Adam Hudacek: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Hudacek: 0.5%MS NOW: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Hudacek: 1.5%MS NOW: 2.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Hudacek: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Hudacek: 1.9%MS NOW: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Hudacek: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Hudacek: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Hudacek: 0.3%MS NOW: 0.3%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Hudacek: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Hudacek: 0.6%MS NOW: 1.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 9.8%Adam Hudacek: 1.0%MS NOW: 2.5%Unattributed Quote9.8%This article: 1.4%Adam Hudacek: 0.5%MS NOW: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection1.4%This article: 38.0%Adam Hudacek: 6.1%MS NOW: 14.2%Biased Writer Voice38.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Hudacek: 0.0%MS NOW: 2.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Hudacek: 3.1%MS NOW: 5.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Hudacek: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Hudacek: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

778 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers17%attributed speech649writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageBill Cassidy • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageRichard Logis • 39 words • 0.0% coverageRichard Logis • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageMarjorie Taylor Greene • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
32 attributed words25% of attributed speech86% writer coverage
0%25.0%50.0%Biased Writer Voice-45.6 ptsWriter: 45.6%Marjorie Taylor Greene: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-11.7 ptsWriter: 11.7%Marjorie Taylor Greene: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-1.7 ptsWriter: 1.7%Marjorie Taylor Greene: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.