RedState91%

LIVE: Election Results  Louisiana Senate Party Runoffs 61%

By Joe Cunningham0%

6/27/2026, 8:45:37 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 78.4% saturation with 280 hits. Analysis detected 1,130 faulty-reasoning hits from 357 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 56.7% and a BS Rank of 61% (8,600 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 60.70% of the article peer group.

Welcome to Louisiana Saturday Night, when we are hosting a runoff in the party primaries for U.S. 
Senate. 
Expect a low-turnout affair tonight, with early voting suggesting 14-17% turnout when it's all said and done. 
Why the low turnout? 
Most of the excitement was about getting U.S. 
Senator Bill Cassidy out of office. 
Since he didn't qualify for the runoff... 
Mission accomplished, as far as most voters are concerned. 
Their job is done. 
But the race for the party nomination for the GOP has been ugly, with State Treasurer and original member of the Congressional Freedom Caucus John Fleming taking the brunt of a lot of attack ads in this race. 
Congresswoman Julia Letlow has kept it clean, but a lot of PAC money has gone in on attacking Fleming. 
Letlow carries the endorsement of President Donald Trump, but that endorsement has been fairly muted in the runoff. 
Aside from a video statement early in the runoff campaign and a tele-rally featuring a pre-recorded message from the president, Trump's attention has been focused elsewhere. 
Fleming, meanwhile, may not have that endorsement, but he did previously work for the Trump administration and has a voting record from his years in Congress that can't be ignored. 
The biggest story? 
Letlow came out of the primary with a 17-point lead, but all recent polling shows this one neck-and-neck. 
If Fleming wins, don't believe any media spin that Trump is losing his grip on the party. 
This election has been filled with a lot of drama in the state that has little to do with the Trump agenda. 
Issues like cabon capture sequestration, dark money, and more have dominated the state's political scene for the past month, and voters have been wrestling with a tough decision. 
On the Democrat side, the heavy favorite is a black farmer, business owner, and gun owner in Jamie Davis. 
He came out of the primary with almost enough votes to make it without a runoff. 
He has the state party's endorsement and a ton of momentum. 
Here are the GOP runoff results: 
And the Democrat runoff results: 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 8.4%Joe Cunningham: 3.8%RedState: 7.0%Confirmation Bias8.4%This article: 5.0%Joe Cunningham: 2.5%RedState: 0.8%Anchoring Bias5.0%This article: 9.5%Joe Cunningham: 3.2%RedState: 3.4%Availability Heuristic9.5%This article: 5.3%Joe Cunningham: 1.4%RedState: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic5.3%This article: 0.0%Joe Cunningham: 0.0%RedState: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 4.8%Joe Cunningham: 4.2%RedState: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias4.8%This article: 16.0%Joe Cunningham: 14.2%RedState: 9.2%Framing Effect16.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Cunningham: 0.0%RedState: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Cunningham: 0.0%RedState: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Cunningham: 0.0%RedState: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 3.1%Joe Cunningham: 0.4%RedState: 1.7%Optimism Bias3.1%This article: 4.8%Joe Cunningham: 2.6%RedState: 1.7%Pessimism Bias4.8%This article: 43.1%Joe Cunningham: 11.1%RedState: 13.9%Negativity Bias43.1%This article: 0.0%Joe Cunningham: 0.0%RedState: 1.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 13.2%Joe Cunningham: 1.7%RedState: 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error13.2%This article: 0.0%Joe Cunningham: 0.0%RedState: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 5.3%Joe Cunningham: 1.3%RedState: 4.7%In-Group Bias5.3%This article: 0.0%Joe Cunningham: 1.5%RedState: 3.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 5.3%Joe Cunningham: 2.3%RedState: 2.0%Halo Effect5.3%This article: 0.0%Joe Cunningham: 0.0%RedState: 0.8%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Cunningham: 0.0%RedState: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 9.8%Joe Cunningham: 2.6%RedState: 1.2%Recency Bias9.8%This article: 0.0%Joe Cunningham: 0.0%RedState: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Cunningham: 0.0%RedState: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Cunningham: 0.0%RedState: 6.9%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Cunningham: 0.6%RedState: 2.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 8.4%Joe Cunningham: 8.4%RedState: 3.3%Appeal to Authority8.4%This article: 13.4%Joe Cunningham: 3.2%RedState: 2.4%False Dilemma13.4%This article: 0.0%Joe Cunningham: 0.0%RedState: 1.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Cunningham: 0.0%RedState: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 26.9%Joe Cunningham: 8.1%RedState: 10.1%Hasty Generalization26.9%This article: 0.0%Joe Cunningham: 0.0%RedState: 0.7%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Cunningham: 1.5%RedState: 0.9%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Cunningham: 2.7%RedState: 8.5%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 4.8%Joe Cunningham: 1.7%RedState: 1.8%Begging the Question4.8%This article: 2.5%Joe Cunningham: 0.8%RedState: 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)2.5%This article: 0.0%Joe Cunningham: 0.0%RedState: 0.9%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Cunningham: 0.0%RedState: 1.2%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Cunningham: 0.0%RedState: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Cunningham: 0.0%RedState: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 16.0%Joe Cunningham: 2.1%RedState: 2.6%Anecdotal16.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Cunningham: 0.0%RedState: 0.3%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 14.6%Joe Cunningham: 1.9%RedState: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)14.6%This article: 0.0%Joe Cunningham: 0.0%RedState: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Cunningham: 0.0%RedState: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Cunningham: 0.0%RedState: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Cunningham: 0.0%RedState: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Cunningham: 0.0%RedState: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Cunningham: 0.0%RedState: 2.4%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Cunningham: 0.0%RedState: 1.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 78.4%Joe Cunningham: 18.0%RedState: 21.5%Biased Writer Voice78.4%This article: 4.8%Joe Cunningham: 5.8%RedState: 4.8%Indoctrination4.8%This article: 5.3%Joe Cunningham: 0.7%RedState: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias5.3%This article: 7.8%Joe Cunningham: 21.1%RedState: 15.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias7.8%This article: 0.0%Joe Cunningham: 3.5%RedState: 3.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

357 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers6.2%attributed speech335writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageBill Cassidy • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageJamie Davis • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Jamie Davis

100%flagged-word coverage
16 attributed words73% of attributed speech85% writer coverage
0%42.5%85.0%Biased Writer Voice-83.6 ptsWriter: 83.6%Jamie Davis: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -8.4 ptsWriter: 8.4%Jamie Davis: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-5.7 ptsWriter: 5.7%Jamie Davis: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-5.1 ptsWriter: 5.1%Jamie Davis: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.