Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video357 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gop Runoff results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 30.4% saturation with 434 hits. Analysis detected 1,871 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,428 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 82% (6,831 of 37,536 keywords). This Gop Runoff is worse (more manipulative) than 81.80% of the peer group.
Gop Runoff
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
82%Gop Runoff (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,428
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

82% percentile
025507510081.8% percentile
5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 30.4%30.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.3%9.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.5%2.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 3.4%3.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 30.4%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos