Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 357 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jamie Davis results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 30.4% saturation with 434 hits . Analysis detected 1,871 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,428 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 82% (6,832 of 37,536 keywords). This Jamie Davis is worse (more manipulative) than 81.80% of the peer group. Jamie Davis
Keyword details
Total words: 1,428
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
82% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 81.8% percentile 5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 30.4% 30.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.3% 9.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 30.4%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst