Topic summary
27% 6 analyzed articles/videos 4,370 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Louisiana Politics results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 1,863 hits . Analysis detected 15,662 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,266 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (14,230 of 16,562 topics). This Louisiana Politics is better (less manipulative) than 85.90% of the peer group. Louisiana Politics
Topic details
Total words: 18,266
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.1% percentile 1.7% BS Score6 analyzed articles18.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.2% 10.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst