Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 886 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kevin McGill results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and False Dilemma , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.8% saturation with 596 hits . Analysis detected 3,891 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,544 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 59% (2,612 of 6,359 authors). This Kevin McGill is worse (more manipulative) than 58.90% of the peer group. Kevin McGill
Author details
Total words: 3,544
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 58.9% percentile 3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 16.8% 16.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.3% 12.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 6.9% 6.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.3%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 16.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 7.5% False Dilemma: Author 6.9%, sitewide 1.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 2.0% Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.1% Ad Hominem: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.4% Horn Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst