Keyword summary
29% 10 analyzed articles/videos 3,915 analyzed words
BS Summary: These House Oversight Committee results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 1,660 hits . Analysis detected 12,495 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,481 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 5% (33,060 of 34,552 keywords). This House Oversight Committee is better (less manipulative) than 95.70% of the peer group. House Oversight Committee
Keyword details
Total words: 20,481
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 4.3% percentile 1.3% BS Score10 analyzed articles20.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 3.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst