Keyword summary
39% 10 analyzed articles/videos 8,381 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Environmental Health results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Availability Heuristic , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 2,758 hits . Analysis detected 27,548 faulty-reasoning hits from 37,868 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 7% (35,148 of 37,536 keywords). This Environmental Health is better (less manipulative) than 93.60% of the peer group. Environmental Health
Keyword details
Total words: 37,868
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.4% percentile 1.4% BS Score10 analyzed articles37.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst