Author summary
0% 6 analyzed articles/videos 3,839 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Know Your Value staff results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22.8% saturation with 2,290 hits . Analysis detected 21,123 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,052 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 80% (1,318 of 6,359 authors). This Know Your Value staff is worse (more manipulative) than 79.30% of the peer group. Know Your Value staff
Author details
Total words: 10,052
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
79% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 79.3% percentile 4.5% BS Score6 analyzed articles10.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 22.6% 22.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.1% 4.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 16.1% 16.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 17.0% 17.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 15.5% 15.5% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 17.6% 17.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 8.0% 8.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 22.8% 22.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 22.8%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Author 22.6%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 17.6%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 17.0%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 16.2%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 16.1%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Author 15.5%, sitewide 6.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 9.1%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 7.2%, sitewide 0.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.9%, sitewide 5.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst