Keyword summary
49% 11 analyzed articles/videos 9,212 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Diabetes results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Indoctrination , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 2,728 hits . Analysis detected 28,350 faulty-reasoning hits from 38,889 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 10% (33,681 of 37,327 keywords). This Diabetes is better (less manipulative) than 90.20% of the peer group. Diabetes
Keyword details
Total words: 38,889
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.8% percentile 1.6% BS Score11 analyzed articles38.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst