Author summary
9%5 analyzed articles/videos3,660 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jennifer Ouellette results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 1,379 hits. Analysis detected 9,462 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,885 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 7% (5,792 of 6,195 authors). This Jennifer Ouellette is better (less manipulative) than 93.50% of the peer group.
Jennifer Ouellette
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
7%Jennifer Ouellette (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 16,885
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

7% percentile
02550751006.5% percentile
1.3% BS Score5 analyzed articles16.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.2%8.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.3%2.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.6%1.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.9%0.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate