Author summary
32% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,551 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elizabeth Cooney results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Optimism Bias , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 857 hits . Analysis detected 7,749 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,005 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 25% (4,994 of 6,628 authors). This Elizabeth Cooney is better (less manipulative) than 75.30% of the peer group. Elizabeth Cooney
Author details
Total words: 10,005
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.7% percentile 1.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles10K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 6.0% 6.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst