Keyword summary
65% 11 analyzed articles/videos 9,721 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dallas results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 3,876 hits . Analysis detected 43,988 faulty-reasoning hits from 49,506 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 16% (29,972 of 35,444 keywords). This Dallas is better (less manipulative) than 84.60% of the peer group. Dallas
Keyword details
Total words: 49,506
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.4% percentile 1.7% BS Score11 analyzed articles49.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst