Author summary
69% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,752 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emma Burleigh results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 1,155 hits . Analysis detected 11,261 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,527 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 50% (3,105 of 6,194 authors). This Emma Burleigh is better (less manipulative) than 50.10% of the peer group. Emma Burleigh
Author details
Total words: 10,527
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.9% percentile 2.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.4% 4.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.0% 11.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.8% 6.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.3% 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 6.6% 6.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 4.0% 4.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.8%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.4%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.6%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst