Norway star Erling Haaland left the U.S. with seven World Cup goals and a taxidermy raccoon, sparking a run on the item 12%

By Chuck Schilken8%

7/14/2026, 7:20:18 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Biased Writer Voice, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 107 hits. Analysis detected 677 faulty-reasoning hits from 716 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 28.4% and a BS Rank of 12% (18,828 of 21,198 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 88.80% of the article peer group.

Erling Haaland is a character. 
Hardcore soccer fans already knew that about the Premier League’s top scorer. 
Casual fans certainly found out during Norway’s run to the World Cup quarterfinal round, where they lost 2-1 to England on Saturday. 
Case in point: After the team’s plane landed at Oslo Airport on Monday, the 6-foot-5 striker with flowing blond hair stepped out with a rather unusual carry-on tucked under his left arm. 
It was a taxidermy raccoon clutching an empty liquor bottle. 
“It followed me home,” Haaland wrote in an Instagram post that also included a photo of himself carrying his new prized possession. 
The stuffed creature was one of many purchases Haaland made during his team’s stay in Dallas for its round of 32 game against Ivory Coast on June 30. 
Following the 2-1 victory at AT&T Stadium, Norway’s all-time leading scorer decided he wanted to add a little Texas style to his look before departing for East Rutherford, N.J., for the next round. 
“I want just a cowboy hat," Haaland said at the time, as seen in a video posted on his YouTube channel. 
"That’s all I want.” 
He ended up getting much more during what ended up being a 90-minute visit to Wild Bill’s Western Store with some team staff members just hours after the game. 
“Just every department: boots, hats, belt, buckles, T-shirts, Western shirts," store co-owner Julie Newport told The Times of Haaland's purchases. 
"It was such a fun time for all of us because they were all chill and relaxed, and our team was just doing their job, you know, getting in the right sizing and having some fun with them." 
At some point while roaming the store, Haaland noticed the hard-partying raccoon and had to have it. 
His haul ended up including two taxidermy squirrels as well  one dressed as a sheriff and the other posed to look like it is drinking out of a Budweiser can. 
The so-called Whiskey Raccoon sells for $750, and the squirrels go for $450 each. 
Because of their price tags, the taxidermy items weren't typically huge sellers. 
Instead, Newport said, folks mainly liked coming by and posing for pictures with them. 
Now, however, they are sold out and in high demand. 
Newport said three of the raccoons are on order and should be in-store by next week. 
After that, she said, the availability depends on whether they can talk the man who makes them out of retirement. 
Other items that Haaland purchased and featured on his YouTube video have also been flying off the shelves. 
Those include a gray Stetson Brenham cowboy hat, Dan Post python boots and a T-shirt that proclaims "Y’all Can Kiss My Dallas." 
“We opened up international shipping for the first time ever, and so we started shipping to Norway, to Germany, to the UK," Newport said. 
"I added Brazil and Australia this morning, and luckily our supplier is able to keep us with it." 
She added: "We're so grateful because we're one store. 
We're locally owned, you know? 
So this is an incredibly exciting time for us, and we're learning how to pivot and handle this kind of exposure and traction with sales. 
It's just been a really wild ride.” 
Born to Norwegian parents in Leeds, England, Haaland moved with his parents to their hometown of Byrne at age 3. 
He has played for Manchester City since 2022 and has won the Premier League's golden boot for most goals scored in three of the last four seasons, including his 27-goal effort in 2025-2026. 
During the World Cup, Haaland garnered a stateside fan base with his seven goals in five matches, as well as his quirky social media posts and fun personality. 
Few were likely surprised when Haaland asked on his Instagram Story for help naming "my new buddy" (a.k.a. the Whiskey Raccoon). 
The choices were Cowboy, Ranger, Tex or R.O.W. 
(Raccoon On Wheels). 
“I think it’s a good thing because I like the Americans," Haaland said of his newfound U.S. popularity during a team news conference last week. 
"I think they are kind of hilarious as well. 
They are funny. 
I like the way they are." 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 3.1%Chuck Schilken: 1.1%Daily Pilot: 2.9%Confirmation Bias3.1%This article: 4.1%Chuck Schilken: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 1.3%Anchoring Bias4.1%This article: 5.9%Chuck Schilken: 1.5%Daily Pilot: 3.5%Availability Heuristic5.9%This article: 6.1%Chuck Schilken: 0.3%Daily Pilot: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic6.1%This article: 2.9%Chuck Schilken: 0.3%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Hindsight Bias2.9%This article: 0.0%Chuck Schilken: 1.0%Daily Pilot: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 3.1%Chuck Schilken: 0.8%Daily Pilot: 7.5%Framing Effect3.1%This article: 0.0%Chuck Schilken: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Schilken: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 3.4%Chuck Schilken: 0.5%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect3.4%This article: 6.0%Chuck Schilken: 3.0%Daily Pilot: 3.6%Optimism Bias6.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Schilken: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 1.4%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Schilken: 0.7%Daily Pilot: 7.7%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 4.3%Chuck Schilken: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 2.2%Self-Serving Bias4.3%This article: 3.9%Chuck Schilken: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error3.9%This article: 0.0%Chuck Schilken: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Schilken: 1.5%Daily Pilot: 1.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Schilken: 0.5%Daily Pilot: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 5.7%Chuck Schilken: 3.1%Daily Pilot: 5.1%Halo Effect5.7%This article: 0.0%Chuck Schilken: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Schilken: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.4%Chuck Schilken: 1.0%Daily Pilot: 1.3%Recency Bias1.4%This article: 1.7%Chuck Schilken: 1.0%Daily Pilot: 0.4%Primacy Effect1.7%This article: 0.0%Chuck Schilken: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Schilken: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Schilken: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Schilken: 1.7%Daily Pilot: 4.9%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Schilken: 0.3%Daily Pilot: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Schilken: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Schilken: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 3.4%Chuck Schilken: 2.3%Daily Pilot: 4.4%Hasty Generalization3.4%This article: 0.0%Chuck Schilken: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 1.4%Chuck Schilken: 0.5%Daily Pilot: 1.0%Bandwagon1.4%This article: 0.7%Chuck Schilken: 1.8%Daily Pilot: 5.7%Appeal to Emotion0.7%This article: 0.0%Chuck Schilken: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 14.9%Chuck Schilken: 2.5%Daily Pilot: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)14.9%This article: 0.0%Chuck Schilken: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Schilken: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Schilken: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Schilken: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 10.9%Chuck Schilken: 0.7%Daily Pilot: 2.8%Anecdotal10.9%This article: 0.0%Chuck Schilken: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Schilken: 0.4%Daily Pilot: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Schilken: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Schilken: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Schilken: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Schilken: 0.3%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Schilken: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Schilken: 1.5%Daily Pilot: 1.3%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Schilken: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 8.2%Chuck Schilken: 1.6%Daily Pilot: 6.0%Biased Writer Voice8.2%This article: 0.0%Chuck Schilken: 2.0%Daily Pilot: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Schilken: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Schilken: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.5%Chuck Schilken: 1.2%Daily Pilot: 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.5%

716 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers40%attributed speech430writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageErling Haaland • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageErling Haaland • 21 words • 0.0% coverageErling Haaland • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageJulie Newport • 20 words • 0.0% coverageJulie Newport • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageJulie Newport • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageJulie Newport • 16 words • 0.0% coverageJulie Newport • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageJulie Newport • 24 words • 0.0% coverageJulie Newport • 18 words • 0.0% coverageJulie Newport • 9 words • 0.0% coverageJulie Newport • 5 words • 100.0% coverageJulie Newport • 25 words • 100.0% coverageJulie Newport • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageErling Haaland • 25 words • 0.0% coverageErling Haaland • 9 words • 0.0% coverageErling Haaland • 3 words • 0.0% coverageErling Haaland • 6 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Julie Newport

40%flagged-word coverage
196 attributed words69% of attributed speech68% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +12.8 ptsWriter: 0.0%Julie Newport: 12.8%12.8%Biased Writer Voice-10.0 ptsWriter: 12.6%Julie Newport: 2.6%2.6%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.