Speaker summary
⁠26%1 analyzed article/video294 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julie Newport results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Sunk Cost Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 43 hits. Analysis detected 133 faulty-reasoning hits from 294 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠3% (27,690 of 28,364 speakers). This Julie Newport is better (less manipulative) than 97.60% of the peer group.
Julie Newport
Speaker details
Total words: 294
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

2% percentile
02550751002.4% percentile
4.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos294 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 1.8%1.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 6.4%6.4%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Speaker 6.1%6.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 11.0%11.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 1.3%1.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 6.1%6.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 11.0%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 3.3%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 0.3%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos