Keyword summary
79% 10 analyzed articles/videos 8,887 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Civilian Casualties results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19% saturation with 7,686 hits . Analysis detected 46,144 faulty-reasoning hits from 40,382 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 35% (24,669 of 37,536 keywords). This Civilian Casualties is better (less manipulative) than 65.70% of the peer group. Civilian Casualties
Keyword details
Total words: 40,382
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.3% percentile 2.3% BS Score10 analyzed articles40.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.5% 9.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 19.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst