Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,868 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anushka Patil results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 1,057 hits . Analysis detected 5,498 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,472 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 46% (3,455 of 6,360 authors). This Anushka Patil is better (less manipulative) than 54.30% of the peer group. Anushka Patil
Author details
Total words: 7,472
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
46% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 45.7% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.5% 4.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.4% 10.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.2% 14.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.4% 0.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.8% 3.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 14.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 13.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Burden of Proof: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst