Author summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos12,799 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aurelien Breeden results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Unattributed Quote, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 3,246 hits. Analysis detected 25,469 faulty-reasoning hits from 40,265 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 5% (6,074 of 6,348 authors). This Aurelien Breeden is better (less manipulative) than 95.70% of the peer group.
Aurelien Breeden
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
5%Aurelien Breeden (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 40,265
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

4% percentile
02550751004.3% percentile
1.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles40.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.0%8.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.1%8.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 6.4%6.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate