Author summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 7,477 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The New York Times results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Unattributed Quote , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 1,981 hits . Analysis detected 14,121 faulty-reasoning hits from 24,190 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 9% (5,818 of 6,360 authors). This The New York Times is better (less manipulative) than 91.50% of the peer group. The New York Times
Author details
Total words: 24,190
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.5% percentile 1.4% BS Score5 analyzed articles24.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.2% 8.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 5.8%, sitewide 1.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst