Author summary
0%4 analyzed articles/videos9,213 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anton Troianovski results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 3,919 hits. Analysis detected 26,336 faulty-reasoning hits from 31,177 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 21% (5,071 of 6,363 authors). This Anton Troianovski is better (less manipulative) than 79.70% of the peer group.
Anton Troianovski
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
21%Anton Troianovski (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 31,177
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

20% percentile
025507510020.3% percentile
1.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles31.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 11.9%11.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 12.6%12.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.6%5.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.2%2.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 11.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 12.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.2%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate