Keyword summary
88% 11 analyzed articles/videos 6,117 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Capitol Hill results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 4,591 hits . Analysis detected 33,309 faulty-reasoning hits from 29,021 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 33% (23,010 of 34,301 keywords). This Capitol Hill is better (less manipulative) than 67.10% of the peer group. Capitol Hill
Keyword details
Total words: 29,021
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.9% percentile 2.3% BS Score11 analyzed articles29K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.4% 11.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 15.8% 15.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst