Author summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 2,698 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jon Michael Raasch results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Overconfidence Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 20.1% saturation with 2,268 hits . Analysis detected 18,795 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,265 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 69% (1,938 of 6,192 authors). This Jon Michael Raasch is worse (more manipulative) than 68.70% of the peer group. Jon Michael Raasch
Author details
Total words: 11,265
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.7% percentile 3.5% BS Score5 analyzed articles11.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 20.1% 20.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 7.5% 7.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 10.6% 10.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.3% 14.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.0% 11.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 5.1% 5.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 7.2% 7.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 20.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 14.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 10.6%, sitewide 4.6% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.2%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.5%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Author 8.0%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.9%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 7.5%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.2%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.1%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Slippery Slope: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst