NPR84%

At a veteran-led protest on Capitol Hill, grief and dismay reverberate over Iran war 79%

By Juliana Kim86%

4/24/2026, 10:46:32 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 28% saturation with 300 hits. Analysis detected 1,266 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,070 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 70.2% and a BS Rank of 79% (4,730 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 78.40% of the article peer group.

When Kevin Benderman learned that the U.S. had entered a war with Iran, his mind teleported back about 20 years to Fort Hood, Texas  the day he received orders to deploy to Iraq. 
That deployment profoundly changed Benderman, an Army veteran now living in Augusta, Ga. 
Despite coming from a long line of military service, he said nothing prepared him for the trauma and loss that he endured. 
" I'm just nervous and upset about what I know the young service members are going to be facing when they are in Iran and what they're already facing," he said. 
That worry led him to drive to Washington D.C. earlier this week. 
He was joined by over 150 veterans and military families who occupied the Cannon House Office Building to call for an end to the war. 
The demonstration on Monday was abruptly ended by Capitol Police, who arrested a total of 66 people. 
About Face, a veteran group who helped organize the protest, said everyone arrested has been released. 
Since then, photos and videos from the act of civil disobedience have spread widely across social media  amplified by others who share a similar frustration and unease about the country's military action. 
The U.S.-Israeli campaign in Iran is nearing the two-month mark. 
On Tuesday, a ceasefire was extended indefinitely while the U.S. continues a naval blockade on Iranian ports. 
As of Friday, American envoys are preparing for a new round of peace talks. 
In response to NPR's request about veterans' concerns over the war, White House spokesperson Anna Kelly said in an emailed statement that President Trump took "decisive action to ensure that Iran could never harm our homeland, our troops, or our allies again." 
"Once Iran's nuclear threat is removed for good, America and the entire world will be safer and more stable," she added. 
Since the start of the war on Feb. 28, some 50,000 American troops have been deployed to the Middle East. 
Thirteen service members have been killed and 400 have been wounded, according to the Defense Department. 
In Iran, over 3,300 people have been killed by U.S.-Israeli attacks, according to the country's forensic medical agency. 
Under the rotunda in the Cannon building, veterans  young, old, some with visible disabilities and all wearing military jackets— held a flag-folding ceremony to honor the American troops who have died in the current conflict. 
They also clutched red tulips in remembrance of the Iranians killed by airstrikes. 
Along with About Face, the protest was organized by the Center on Conscience and War (CCW), Veterans For Peace, the Fayetteville Resistance Coalition, Military Families Speak Out and 50501 Veterans. 
"We cannot afford another war," Matt Howard, About Face's interim organizing director and a Marine Corps veteran, said in a statement. 
"Funding this war means putting even more lives at risk." 
A Reuters/Ipsos poll conducted from April 15-20 found that 60% of Americans disapprove of the U.S. military strikes against Iran. 
In response to a question about the costs and the benefits to the U.S., 51% of those surveyed said the military action wasn't worth it. 
Benderman said he sees a lot of parallels between the Iraq war and the current conflict with Iran. 
When he was deployed to Iraq in 2003, he believed the U.S. was going to war because Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and represented a threat. 
But evidence of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction were never found. 
Now, hearing the president warn that Iran was on the cusp of a nuclear weapon, Benderman can't help but be skeptical. 
" I always believed that… if my country was going to send me to a war, it would have a damn good reason to do it and it would be justified," he said. 
"There was no justification to send us to Iraq, just like there's no justification for us to be going into Iran." 
After his first tour in Iraq, Benderman refused to deployed again on moral grounds and was sentenced to 15 months in a military prison. 
To this day, Benderman said he's haunted by the Iraq war. 
He added that the hardest moment in his military service was attending the ceremonies of those killed in action and watching bereaved family members break down. 
" I do not wanna see another family dealing with that same type of grief," he said. 
Robert Cheng, another Army veteran who participated in the demonstration, said his concern was that the conflict with Iran will drag on for years, like America's involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan. 
"I had this deep sense of frustration that we were allowing another war to start in my lifetime," he said. 
Cheng added that he was especially horrified by the deadly Feb. 28 missile strike on an Iranian girls' school, which a preliminary assessment determined the U.S. was responsible for, and the ongoing U.S. blockade on Iranian ports. 
"This military action that is being taken by the United States and Israel is not improving the situation," he said. 
" This is not a solution to potential nuclear de-escalation." 
Cheng said he has also been disturbed by how the White House has portrayed the war on social media with edited videos that mix together footage of actual airstrikes in Iran with pop music and video game clips. 
"The White House is treating this conflict like a game while people's lives are at stake," he said. 
For Jessica Serrato, whose partner is currently deployed in the Middle East, it's been a constant state of worry since the war began  worries about whether her partner will return home safely and how the war might affect him mentally in the months and years ahead. 
" He's also scared to some extent, but he's on fight or flight mode," she said. 
Serrato said she had long understood that military life involves risks and sacrifice. 
But it's been difficult for her to accept this situation because she said she doesn't fully understand the administration's objectives in Iran. 
When she traveled to Capitol Hill this week for the protest, she did so in hopes of getting clarity to questions that have been weighing on her for weeks. 
"When they're gonna get to come home? 
Why are they there?" 
she said. 
"And why do they keep sending more troops?" 
But even after returning home, she's still seeking answers. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 2.0%Juliana Kim: 2.6%Goats and Soda (NPR): 3.4%Confirmation Bias2.0%This article: 0.0%Juliana Kim: 0.7%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 7.8%Juliana Kim: 5.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 3.8%Availability Heuristic7.8%This article: 0.0%Juliana Kim: 1.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 3.6%Juliana Kim: 0.9%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.8%Hindsight Bias3.6%This article: 3.9%Juliana Kim: 1.5%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.4%Overconfidence Bias3.9%This article: 3.3%Juliana Kim: 6.6%Goats and Soda (NPR): 11.1%Framing Effect3.3%This article: 2.5%Juliana Kim: 0.6%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.2%Loss Aversion2.5%This article: 0.0%Juliana Kim: 0.8%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Juliana Kim: 0.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 5.9%Juliana Kim: 3.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 3.4%Optimism Bias5.9%This article: 10.4%Juliana Kim: 2.8%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.3%Pessimism Bias10.4%This article: 28.0%Juliana Kim: 10.5%Goats and Soda (NPR): 11.3%Negativity Bias28.0%This article: 0.0%Juliana Kim: 1.8%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.3%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Juliana Kim: 0.8%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Juliana Kim: 0.4%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 1.2%Juliana Kim: 0.9%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.3%In-Group Bias1.2%This article: 0.0%Juliana Kim: 0.8%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Juliana Kim: 4.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Juliana Kim: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Juliana Kim: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Juliana Kim: 1.8%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.7%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Juliana Kim: 0.4%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Juliana Kim: 0.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 1.7%Juliana Kim: 1.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.2%Ad Hominem1.7%This article: 0.0%Juliana Kim: 0.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 3.9%Juliana Kim: 2.7%Goats and Soda (NPR): 6.1%Appeal to Authority3.9%This article: 0.0%Juliana Kim: 0.5%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.5%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Juliana Kim: 1.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Juliana Kim: 0.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 2.0%Juliana Kim: 3.8%Goats and Soda (NPR): 4.4%Hasty Generalization2.0%This article: 0.0%Juliana Kim: 0.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 5.0%Juliana Kim: 0.7%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.7%Bandwagon5.0%This article: 15.8%Juliana Kim: 8.6%Goats and Soda (NPR): 6.6%Appeal to Emotion15.8%This article: 0.0%Juliana Kim: 0.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Juliana Kim: 1.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Juliana Kim: 0.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Juliana Kim: 0.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Juliana Kim: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Juliana Kim: 0.4%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Juliana Kim: 1.5%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Juliana Kim: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Juliana Kim: 1.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Juliana Kim: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Juliana Kim: 0.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 2.1%Juliana Kim: 0.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%Personal Incredulity2.1%This article: 0.0%Juliana Kim: 0.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Juliana Kim: 0.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.5%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Juliana Kim: 0.8%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.3%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Juliana Kim: 0.7%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 18.1%Juliana Kim: 4.4%Goats and Soda (NPR): 3.1%Biased Writer Voice18.1%This article: 0.0%Juliana Kim: 0.5%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 1.3%Juliana Kim: 0.5%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias1.3%This article: 0.0%Juliana Kim: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Juliana Kim: 0.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

1070 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers54%attributed speech497writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageKevin Benderman • 22 words • 0.0% coverageKevin Benderman • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageAbout Face • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageAnna Kelly • 42 words • 0.0% coverageAnna Kelly • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageMatt Howard • 21 words • 0.0% coverageMatt Howard • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageKevin Benderman • 18 words • 0.0% coverageKevin Benderman • 27 words • 0.0% coverageKevin Benderman • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageKevin Benderman • 33 words • 0.0% coverageKevin Benderman • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageKevin Benderman • 11 words • 0.0% coverageKevin Benderman • 26 words • 0.0% coverageKevin Benderman • 17 words • 0.0% coverageRobert Cheng • 31 words • 0.0% coverageRobert Cheng • 20 words • 0.0% coverageRobert Cheng • 37 words • 0.0% coverageRobert Cheng • 20 words • 0.0% coverageRobert Cheng • 10 words • 0.0% coverageRobert Cheng • 38 words • 0.0% coverageRobert Cheng • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 47 words • 100.0% coverageJessica Serrato • 16 words • 0.0% coverageJessica Serrato • 13 words • 0.0% coverageJessica Serrato • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageJessica Serrato • 7 words • 0.0% coverageJessica Serrato • 4 words • 0.0% coverageJessica Serrato • 2 words • 0.0% coverageJessica Serrato • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Anna Kelly

100%flagged-word coverage
63 attributed words11% of attributed speech69% writer coverage
0%20.0%40.0%Biased Writer Voice-39.0 ptsWriter: 39.0%Anna Kelly: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-2.8 ptsWriter: 2.8%Anna Kelly: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.