Author summary
0%7 analyzed articles/videos3,461 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brandi Fullwood results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 1,899 hits. Analysis detected 19,958 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,749 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 28% (4,631 of 6,364 authors). This Brandi Fullwood is better (less manipulative) than 72.80% of the peer group.
Brandi Fullwood
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
28%Brandi Fullwood (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 23,749
Article count: 7
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

27% percentile
025507510027.2% percentile
1.9% BS Score7 analyzed articles23.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.9%5.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.5%4.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.4%4.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 7.0%7.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.9%3.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.3%2.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.5%4.5%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Author 8.0%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 7.0%, sitewide 0.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 5.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate