Keyword summary
74% 14 analyzed articles/videos 15,004 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cannabis results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 5,614 hits . Analysis detected 45,186 faulty-reasoning hits from 56,082 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 12% (30,237 of 34,040 keywords). This Cannabis is better (less manipulative) than 88.80% of the peer group. Cannabis
Keyword details
Total words: 56,082
Article count: 14
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.2% percentile 1.6% BS Score14 analyzed articles56.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.0% 10.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst