Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 2,415 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shannon Keating results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 652 hits . Analysis detected 6,787 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,660 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 18% (5,029 of 6,135 authors). This Shannon Keating is better (less manipulative) than 82.00% of the peer group. Shannon Keating
Author details
Total words: 9,660
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.0% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.2% 3.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 6.0%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.8%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.4% False Dilemma: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst