Author summary
⁠45%2 analyzed articles/videos1,032 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Webb Wright results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.6% saturation with 769 hits. Analysis detected 4,216 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,128 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (2,189 of 6,603 authors). This Webb Wright is worse (more manipulative) than 66.90% of the peer group.
Webb Wright
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠67%Webb Wright (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,128
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

67% percentile
025507510066.9% percentile
3.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.0%8.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 18.6%18.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.6%9.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 8.3%8.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.3%4.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.8%4.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.6%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 18.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.5%Composition/Division: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.2%Hindsight Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos